Recall: A New American Revolution

America is awash in near-instant communications technology and 24-7 media. Yet many politicians count on their constituents having short-term memories. These profligate politicians spend tax dollars recklessly and increase the size of government regardless of the public's growing concern over what this unsustainable debt will do the economy and to the next generations. Just before elections, the big-spending incumbents present themselves as budget hawks, with a compliant media fostering amnesia among the plucked taxpayers.

At the beginning of the 20th century, a progressive movement began to use recall to hold office holders more accountable. The impetus at that time was concern over the

political influence of monopolies of industrialists and banks. In our time, government and public employee unions have become major sources of corruption, creating bureaucracies insulated from the people who are paying for it all.

Recall can provide more accountability in between elections and put office holders on notice that they are being watched. Recall is now available to constituents in 18 states. Another 13 states have initiative procedures whereby petitioners could put recall measures on the ballot. provides each state's relevant laws, plus updated news and commentary on recall efforts around the nation.

Welcome to the new American Revolution.

Latest Recall News

Deadline for May Recall Passes in Michigan Town, but Drive Goes On

(02/23/15) — “PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP -- There won't be a recall election in May, but efforts to oust Plymouth Township's three full-time elected officials, plus a longtime Board of Trustees member, are continuing. Supervisor Richard Reaume, Clerk Nancy Conzelman, Treasurer Ron Edwards and Trustee Kay Arnold are the targets of the recall effort, which proponents say was started out of frustration with what they call the officials' unwillingness to listen to and share information with the public, particularly on recent recreation projects. Recall targets say they have considered public input and been open and that the recall is being led by a disgruntled minority. Activists missed a Jan. 30 deadline for a May recall election, but are still gathering voters' signatures on recall petitions against the four. About 3,200 petition signatures are needed, against each of them, in order to force a recall election against all four.”
Read more.

Colorado Councilwoman Survives Recall

(02/11/15) — “SILVERTON - After months of seething political tensions, elaborate scheming, and Capulet vs. Montague grudge-nursing, on Tuesday night Silverton Town Board Trustee Karla Safranski prevailed in a recall election, defeating Patty Dailey 245 votes to 201.”
Read more.

Michigan Town Official to Face Recall Election

(02/20/15) — “TAWAS CITY - The question as to whether Tawas City Mayor Pro Tem Dave Dickman should be removed from office will be on the May 5 ballot, according to Iosco County Clerk Nancy Huebel. Huebel said the ballot will also list candidates to replace Dickman, should he be recalled. Dickman will be one of those names, since he did not withdraw from consideration within 10 days of the filing of the recall petitions.”
Read more.

Recall Petitions filed in New Mexico City

(02/10/15) — “LAS CRUCES -- Petitions to recall Las Cruces city councilors Gill Sorg, Olga Pedroza, and Nathan Small were submitted on Feb. 6. The city clerk has 20 working days to verify the signatures on the petitions. The recall campaign was organized by a group, New Mexicans for a Better Tomorrow. The group quickly raised more than $30,000, mostly from local businessmen. In the last year, many in the business community have opposed a new minimum wage law drafted by the group Communities in Action and Faith. The three councilors targeted in the recall voted against the minimum wage law in a stated effort to get the measure on the November ballot. But that effort failed when the other councilors and the Mayor voted to approve the law with stated intentions of making adjustments at a later date.”
Read more.